Skip to content
Statistics logo
  • Courses
    • See All Courses
    • Calendar
    • Intro stats for college credit
    • Faculty
    • Group training
    • Credit & Credentialing
    • Teach With Us
  • Programs/Degrees
    • Certificates
      • Analytics for Data Science
      • Biostatistics
      • Programming For Data Science – Python (Experienced)
      • Programming For Data Science – Python (Novice)
      • Programming For Data Science – R (Experienced)
      • Programming For Data Science – R (Novice)
      • Social Science
    • Skillsets
      • Bayesian Statistics
      • Business Analytics
      • Healthcare Analytics
      • Marketing Analytics
      • Operations Research
      • Predictive Analytics
      • Python Analytics
      • R Programming Analytics
      • Rasch & IRT
      • Spatial Statistics
      • Survey Analysis
      • Text Mining Analytics
    • Undergraduate Degree Programs
    • Graduate Degree Programs
  • Partnerships
    • Higher Education
    • Enterprise
  • Resources
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Word Of The Week
    • Newsletter signup
    • Glossary
    • Statistical Symbols
    • FAQs & Knowledge Base
    • Testimonials
    • Test Yourself
  • Student Login

Home Blog Conditional Probability Word of the Week

Conditional Probability Word of the Week

QUESTION:  The rate of residential insurance fraud is 10% (one out of ten claims is fraudulent).  A consultant has proposed a machine learning system to review claims and classify them as fraud or no-fraud.  The system is 90% effective in detecting the fraudulent claims, but only 80% effective in correctly classifying the non-fraud claims (it mistakenly labels one in five as "fraud").  If the system classifies a claim as fraudulent, what is the probability that it really is fraudulent?

SOLUTION

This is a problem in conditional probability. (It?s also a Bayesian problem, but applying the formula in Bayes Rule only helps to obscure what?s going on.)  Consider 100 claims. 10 will be fraudulent, and the system will correctly label 9 of them as “fraud.” 90 claims will be OK, but the system will incorrectly classify 18 (20%) as “fraud.”  So a total of 27 claims have been labeled as fraudulent, but only 9 of them, 33%, are actually fraudulent. Translating into probability terms:

Given that a claim has been labeled as fraudulent, the probability is 0.33 that it is actually fraudulent.

Or, in symbols:

P(fraud|”fraud” label) = 0.33   (the vertical bar means “given that.”)

Subscribe to the Blog

You have Successfully Subscribed!

By submitting your information, you agree to receive email communications from statistics.com. All information submitted is subject to our privacy policy. You may opt out of receiving communications at any time.

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Table Test
  • Oct 19: Data Literacy – The Chainsaw Case
  • Data Literacy – The Chainsaw Case

About Statistics.com

Statistics.com offers academic and professional education in statistics, analytics, and data science at beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels of instruction. Statistics.com is a part of Elder Research, a data science consultancy with 25 years of experience in data analytics.

Our Links

  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Explore Courses
  • About Us
  • Management Team
Menu
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Explore Courses
  • About Us
  • Management Team

Social Networks

Linkedin-in Twitter Facebook-f Youtube

Contact

The Institute for Statistics Education
2107 Wilson Blvd
Suite 850 
Arlington, VA 22201
(571) 281-8817

ourcourses@statistics.com

  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Explore Courses
  • About Us
  • Management Team

© Copyright 2022 - Statistics.com, LLC | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

Accept